Degree is a basic measure of node centrality, defined as the sum of node connection weights. Here, we show the equivalence of the degree and its extension, the second degree, with five measures of communication, control, and diversity. Since many of these measures assume that activity propagates on physical networks, we primarily study them on structural networks in our example brain-imaging data.
File ‘abct_utils.py’ already there; not retrieving.
Note: you may need to restart the kernel to use updated packages.
Relationship between degree and measures of diffusion
We first consider the weighted degree (or strength), defined for each node as the sum of its connection weights. We compute and visualize the map of the degree.
/tmp/ipykernel_300480/2920194165.py:2: UserWarning:
FigureCanvasAgg is non-interactive, and thus cannot be shown
In many cases of interest, the degree is approximately equivalent to eigenvector centrality and diffusion efficiency, two popular measures of nodal centrality based on the assumption of diffusion dynamics or random walks.
Relationship between second degree and measures of communication and control
We next consider the second degree, defined for each node as the sum of its squared connection weights. We compute and visualize the map of the second degree.
/tmp/ipykernel_300480/1759232829.py:4: UserWarning:
FigureCanvasAgg is non-interactive, and thus cannot be shown
The second degree is exactly or approximately equivalent to communicability centrality, average controllability, and modal controllability, three popular measures of communication and control. These measures are also based on the assumption of diffusion dynamics and consider the number and length of all possible walks between two pairs of nodes.